Research ArticleOpen access
Minimizing Blood Leakage During Peripheral IV Cannulation: The role of Blood Control Septum Technology
Akhil Agrawal
Journal of Infusion Nurses Society, India|Vol. 1 · Issue 1 · 2026 · 1 November 2026
Peripheral intravenous (IV) cannulation is one of the most common invasive procedures, yet blood leakage during placement and manipulation remains an under-monitored issue that increases occupational pathogen exposure, patient discomfort, and hospital costs. Standard open catheters lack anti-reflux mechanisms, frequently causing blood spillage during line connection. Evidence from multiple independent randomized controlled and observational studies shows that blood- control septum IV cannulas, which feature an internal valve that automatically closes upon needle withdrawal,significantly reduce blood leakage from rates as high as 68.4% down to 2.0%–14.1%. Adopting blood-control technology alongside structured standard operating procedures, mandatory competency training, and routine clinical audits offers a pragmatic strategy to eliminate avoidable blood exposure. Furthermore, addressing the absence of localized data through formal surveillance will help optimize infusion nursing practice and health-system safety.
Introduction
Peripheral intravenous (IV) cannulation remainsoneofthemostfrequentlyperformed invasive procedures in clinical practice. International prevalence data indicate that roughly one in four hospitalized patients carries a peripheral IV catheter at any given time, and more than a billion such devices are placed worldwide each year.
While essential for delivering fluids, medications, blood products, and parenteral nutrition, cannulation is not free of complications.
Phlebitis, infiltration, catheter failure, and blood leakage during insertion or manipulation are well recognized, yet blood leakage remains under-monitored and inconsistently reported in routine practice.
Clinical Context
The principal causes of blood exposure and spillage during cannulation are blood splashes, blood leakages, and insufficient compression of the punctured vein during connection or disconnection of Luer devices.
Blood leakage typically occurs when blood backflows through the cannula hub after successful venous access, before the IV line or obturator is connected. In conventional open cannula systems, even this brief window can result in blood spillage onto gloves, linen, and surrounding surfaces, raising the risk of contamination and occupational exposure. Clinical data and surveys have estimated that clinicians encounter a very high percentage of visible blood leakages up to 61.2% during placement and 74% during disconnection or catheter manipulation.
Occupational exposure to blood carries direct infection risk. The World Health Organization's widely cited estimate is that around three million healthcare workers sustain percutaneous blood exposure annually, contributing to tens of thousands of new hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and HIV infections each year.
Despite growing awareness of occupational blood exposure risk, blood leakage during IV Cannulation remains common with conventional cannulas. This document is a clinical practice-focused synthesis intended to share the latest technology to reduce blood leakage.
Innovation – Blood-Control Septum IV Cannula
Device design plays a central role in preventing blood leakage. Conventional cannulas have no anti-reflux mechanism, so blood flows freely once the vein is accessed until the line is connected. Blood-control IV cannulas address this by incorporating an internal septum or valve that closes automatically when the introducer needle is withdrawn, converting the device into a closed system during vessel entry.
The evidence base for this design has strengthened over the past decade. Notably, the effect has been replicated across independent research studies evaluating different blood-control devices, rather than resting on a single study. A prospective, randomized controlled trial in an emergency department setting found blood leakage with a blood-control catheter was reduced to 14.1%, compared with 68.4% for a standard catheter, with the blood-control device also superior in eliminating blood-exposure risk (93.9% vs 19.1%) and in removing the need for manual A separate twodigital compression (95.3% vs 19.1%). phase randomized trial reported blood leakage falling from 39.1% with a conventional catheter to 2.0% with a blood-control catheter, with clinician-rated acceptability equal to or better than the standard device.
A third prospective observational evaluation of a blood-control catheter designed specifically to prevent leakage reported a comparable reduction versus conventional safety catheters, together with lower associated cleaning workload. Taken together, these three independently conducted studies, carried out by different research teams and evaluating different blood control catheter devices, consistently demonstrate reductions in blood leakage and clinician blood-exposure risk, which strengthens confidence that the benefit arises from the closed-system mechanism itself rather than the performance of any single device or study.
Key Learning
No published Indian data currently quantify the incidence of blood leakage during IV cannulation. International audits of IV therapy continue to identify blood leakage, and dressing contamination is common but inconsistently documented occurrences.
This gap supports the case
for structured local data collection alongside adoption of blood-control technology.
Implications for Infusion Nursing Practice
Blood leakage during cannulation has consequences across three domains. For healthcare workers, it raises exposure risk to blood-borne pathogens, increases needlestick risk during hurried line connection, and adds psychological stress and post-exposure workflow burden.
For patients, visible leakage can signal compromised aseptic technique, contributing to infection risk, repeated attempts, discomfort, and reduced confidence in nursing care.
For hospitals, blood leakage generates additional cannula use, cleaning and waste-management costs, occupational-exposure follow-up costs, and potential quality and medico-legal exposure. Table 1: Blood Leakage Prevention Toolkit (based on available evidence and clinical practice) 1.
Any visible blood leakage, regardless of volume, should prompt immediate dressing and linen replacement. 2.
Every hospital should have a written SOP defining blood leakage, reporting requirements, escalation pathways, and . response actions 3.
Competency-based training and simulation for cannulation techniques should be mandatory at onboarding. 4.
Where feasible, hospitals should preferentially adopt blood-control cannulas for routine peripheral access. 5.
Blood leakage prevention should be embedded into routine nursing audits, rather than treated as an incidental observation.
Conclusion
Blood leakage during peripheral IV cannulation is a common but under-documented event with real consequences for healthcare worker safety, patient experience, and increased treatment cost. The evidence for blood-control cannula design is consistent and has been reinforced by more recent randomized and observational data, while broader literature on occupational exposure also confirms that sharps injuries and blood exposure remain persistent risks for nursing staff, including in India. Closing the local data gap through structured surveillance, paired with SOP-driven practice and device-level prevention, represents a pragmatic path to reducing this avoidable exposure.
Declarations
This communication is intended for educational purposes.
Funding
No external funding was received for this work.
Conflict of Interest
There is no conflict of interest
7.
Onia R, Eshun-Wilson I, Arce C, et al. Evaluation of a new Ethical Considerations safety peripheral intravenous catheter designed to reduce This communication is based on previously published mucocutaneous blood exposure. Curr Med Res Opin. literature; no primary patient data was collected.
2011;27(7):1339–1346.
8.
Haeseler G, Maier C, Piepenbrock S. Blood contamination References during peripheral venous cannulation: an under-recognized problem. J Vasc Access. 2015;16(3):233–236. 1.
Alexandrou E, Ray-Barruel G, Carr PJ, Frost S, Inwood S, Higgins N, et al. International prevalence of the use of peripheral 9.
World Health Organization. Guidelines on core components intravenous catheters. J Hosp Med. 2024;19(2):85–94.
of infection prevention and control programmes at the national and acute health care facility level. Geneva: WHO; 2.
Helm RE, Klausner JD, Klemperer JD, Flint LM, Huang E.
2016. Accepted but unacceptable: peripheral IV catheter failure. J Infus Nurs. 2015 May-Jun;38(3):189–203.
- Seiberlich LE, Keay V, Kallos S, Junghans T, Lang E, McRae
AD. Clinical performance of a new blood control peripheral 3.
Marsh N, Webster J, Larsen E, Cooke M, Mihala G, intravenous catheter: a prospective, randomized, controlled Rickard CM. Peripheral intravenous catheter failure and study. Int Emerg Nurs.2016;25:59–64. complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2024;147:104687.
- Haeseler G, Hildebrand M, Fritscher J. Efficacy and ease of
use of an intravenous catheter designed to prevent blood Richardson D, Kaufman L. Reducing blood exposure 4.
leakage: a prospective observational trial. J Vasc Access. risk and costs associated with SPIVC insertion. Nurs 2015;16(5):398–403. Manag.2011;42(12):31–34.
- Beyene Z, Mitiku HZ, Ayenew T, Abebe M, Kefie M, 5.
Cooper DM, Whitfield M, Newton D, Chiarella J, Machaczek Edmealem A, et al. Time to phlebitis onset and its predictors K. Introduction of a non-ported peripheral intravenous among admitted patients with peripheral intravenous catheter with multi-use blood control septum offers cannulas at Debre Markos Comprehensive Specialized improvements in the overall efficiency of the procedure Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, 2024/2025: a prospective and is clinically well accepted. Int J Healthc Technol follow-up study. PLoS One. 2025. Manag.2016;15(3):177–193.
- Loveday HP, Wilson JA, Pratt RJ, Golsorkhi M, Tingle A, 6.
Jagger J, Perry J, Parker G, Phillips EK. Nursing 2011 survey Bak A, et al. epic3: national evidence-based guidelines results: blood exposure risk during peripheral IV catheter for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS insertion and removal. Nursing. 2011;41(12):45–49.
hospitals in England. J Hosp Infect. 2014;86(Suppl 1): S1–70.